6GHz Spectrum: Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities
The FCC recently opened the 6GHz band for fixed wireless access (FWA) broadband, providing 850 MHz of currently clean spectrum for unlicensed outdoor use. Operating on the 6GHz band enables wireless internet service providers (WISPs) to deliver gigabit broadband access with less interference.
To unlock the full potential of the 6GHz spectrum for broadband, however, providers must overcome some critical challenges, including limited 160 MHz channel availability in rural America and the potential for congestion as more unlicensed competitors use the spectrum. This blog summarizes the benefits of the 6 GHz spectrum for fixed wireless operators before describing potential challenges and how to overcome them.
What’s new about the 6GHz spectrum?
The major benefit of the 6GHz band is that it adds a significant amount of clean (a.k.a., unused) spectrum for unlicensed FWA, much more than 2.4GHz and 5GHz combined. Because that large spectrum is new, it has less interference than the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands due to a relative lack of operators in the market. This allows fixed wireless providers to deliver faster and more reliable broadband access while avoiding network congestion.
Challenges to overcome
While 6GHz provides huge benefits for FWA providers and other WISPs, they must address and overcome several technological and practical barriers to take full advantage of the opportunities.
| Challenge | Description |
|---|---|
| Spectrum availability | Actually achieving gigabit speeds requires at least 160MHz of spectrum per connection, which isn’t available in much of the country. |
| Future interference | The 6GHz band will quickly fill up with competing fixed wireless operators and Wi-Fi 6E radios, creating interference and congestion. |
| Technological limitations | Most Wi-Fi-based fixed wireless products fail to maximize channel availability in the 6GHz spectrum. |
Anticipating 6GHz interference
Because the 6GHz band is still new, the spectrum is relatively unused, so most operators experience little congestion or interference. However, now that the band is open to fixed wireless access providers (Link to: Fixed Wireless Access Companies Compared when published), the increase in operators will expand traffic rapidly in that formerly easy-flowing current.
This inevitable escalation forces more users into fewer “lanes,” or available frequencies, which are expected to be unreliable because the AFC doesn’t prevent interference from other unlicensed operators – it only considers licensed incumbent operators when determining available frequencies. In addition, the expected proliferation of Wi-Fi 6E technology in the coming years will increase the number of radios on the spectrum and create even more interference and congestion.
Spectrum availability challenges
Actually achieving the gigabit speeds promised by 6GHz broadband requires the availability of at least 160MHz of spectrum per connection. The Automated Frequency Coordination (AFC) system determines the available frequencies based on channel usage by licensed operators (such as fixed satellites and radio astronomers) and only allows unlicensed operators to use the remaining channels.
For much of America (especially in rural areas), according to recent research from Tarana Wireless, the difficulty lies in balancing the number of operators and channels. Only 30% of rural areas have enough 160MHz channels to support multiple operators, or there are just too many operators in general, and sometimes there are no 160MHz channels at all. Limited 160 MHz channel availability prevents fixed wireless providers from delivering gigabit broadband speeds and increases congestion on the network, reducing performance and reliability.
Technological limitations of fixed-wireless products
Wi-Fi-based fixed wireless products fail to solve the current and predicted problems that FWA providers face when operating on the 6GHz band. They typically require at least two 160MHz channels to provide gigabit speeds and full coverage, although many areas of the US only have one 160MHz channel available. More competitive locations may require up to four channels for full coverage (the maximum 160MHz channels in the 6GHz spectrum). These products also provide limited protection against interference from other unlicensed operators and fail to deliver the speed and performance required by subscribers.
Exploring opportunities on the 6GHz spectrum
Despite these challenges, fixed wireless operators can still achieve the speed and performance the 6GHz spectrum promises if they choose the right technology solutions. For example, the next-generation fixed wireless access (ngFWA) G1 platform from Tarana Wireless helps service providers maximize 160 MHz channel availability while minimizing interference. Tarana’s 6GHz base nodes (BNs) and remote nodes (RNs) support the use of four independent, discontiguous 40 MHz carriers to provide a 160MHz channel. According to Tarana research, 76% of rural areas have enough 40 MHz channels to support two operators in the same market, which means delivering gigabit performance is almost guaranteed when using the G1 platform.
As a trusted Tarana Wireless distributor, WAV can connect you with the top 6GHz spectrum solutions for fixed wireless broadband providers. Partnering with Tarana and WAV ensures access to consistent stock, white-glove support, and the most cutting-edge ngFWA technology.
Contact the wireless networking experts at WAV to find out more about maximizing your 6GHz spectrum opportunities.
Learn more about Next Generation Fixed Wireless Access (ngFWA)
Fixed Wireless Access Companies Compared
This article assesses fixed wireless access equipment suppliers and ranks the top six based on maximum throughput, interference canceling technology, non-line-of-sight (NLOS) capability, beamforming capacity, and access points per tower.
View Details
BEAD Program & State Allocations for Funding
Explore how the Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) allocated $42.45 billion to the states.
View Details
Tribal Broadband Connectivity Program Explained
This guide explains the TBCP program, who can apply, and what types of broadband projects it funds before describing the broadband technologies best suited for deployments on tribal lands.
View Details
Fixed Wireless vs. Fiber: A Comparison
This blog compares fixed wireless vs. fiber based on deployment cost and speed, network coverage, reliability, and performance and discusses how FWA can help bridge the digital divide.
View Details
Non-Line of Sight (NLOS) Broadband Wireless Solution
Compare between LOS and NLOS in terms of distance, density, interference, frequencies, propagation, signal quality, and other characteristics.
View Details
